lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250216111800.GV17863@unreal>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 13:18:00 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Tatyana Nikolova <tatyana.e.nikolova@...el.com>, jgg@...dia.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [iwl-next,rdma v3 00/24] Add RDMA support for Intel IPU E2000
 (GEN3)

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 05:12:46PM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 2/10/25 12:09, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > > On 2/7/25 20:49, Tatyana Nikolova wrote:
> > > > This patch series is based on 6.14-rc1 and includes both netdev and RDMA
> > > > patches for ease of review. It can also be viewed here [1]. A shared pull
> > > > request will be sent for patches 1-7 following review.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > TLDR of my mail: could be take 1st patch prior to the rest?
> > > 
> > > > V2 RFC series is at https://lwn.net/Articles/987141/.
> > > 
> > > code there was mostly the same, and noone commented, I bet due
> > > to the sheer size of the series
> > 
> > It was very optimistic to expect for a review during holiday season
> > and merge window, especially series of 25 patches which are marked
> > as RFC.
> 
> that's true
> 
> so, given most of the patches will go via your tree, how do you want
> to split us the existing ones into series?
> 
> a) 1st, idpf, rdma
> b) 1st, rest
> c) all together
> 
> In any case I will do a review too of course

There is a need to get Acks for the netdev part and because that part is
going to be before RDMA patches, the fist option is proffered one.

If you plan to merge everything in this cycle, netdev and RDMA parts need
to be merged into some shared branch based on clean -rcX.

I can do it for you as well, but first need to get Acks for netdev part.

Thanks

> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ