lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eab6c81-2015-4d5e-a1af-7ebe0208996a@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:14:10 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] arm64: Kconfig: expand STM32 Armv8 SoC with
 STM32MP21 SoCs family

On 14/02/2025 16:06, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> On 2/13/25 10:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:21:01PM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>> Expand config ARCH_STM32 with the new STM32MP21 SoCs family which is
>>> composed of STM32MP211, STM32MP213 and STM32MP215 SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> index 844a39620cfea8bfc031a545d85e33894ef20994..f788dbc09c9eb6f5801758ccf6b0ffe50a96090e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> @@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ config ARCH_STM32
>>>   			- STM32MP251, STM32MP253, STM32MP255 and STM32MP257.
>>>   		- STM32MP23:
>>>   			- STM32MP231, STM32MP233, STM32MP235.
>>> +		- STM32MP21:
>>
>> Squash it with previous patch and keep some sort of order.
>>
> 
> Ok for squashing with patch 3.
> Do you mean to keep the current chronological order used here or to 

chronological of what? Adding it? That's the worse of possible orders,
because it is basically random invitation to conflicts.

If chronological of market release, that's tricky to any contributor to
figure out.

> change the order because "chronological" is not an appropriate order? In 
> this case, would the alphanumeric order be fine?

Many lists go alphanumerical because it is most obvious and avoids
conflicts.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ