[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250217143738.24390532@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:37:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/4] Support PTP clock for Wangxun NICs
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:47:51 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 8:52 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:30:37 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > > Implement support for PTP clock on Wangxun NICs.
> >
> > Please run:
> >
> > ./scripts/kernel-doc -none -Wall drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/*/*
> >
> > Existing errors are fine, but you shouldn't be adding new ones.
> > You're missing documentation for return values for a lot of functions.
> >
> > Note that adding kdoc is not required, you can just remove it where
> > it doesn't add value. But if you add kdoc comments they need to be
> > fully specified.
>
> OK, I'll fix it in the V8 patch set.
> So what is the conclusion about the "work" item. Should I revert it to V6?
Not, why? IIUC people who replied on that thread were just backing up
my assertion that aux_work is much better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists