netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] tcp: add TCP_RTO_MAX_MIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4dc10429-29dd-47bb-bd5f-6a8654ed2fec@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:38:17 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com, ast@...nel.org,
 daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 ykolal@...com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] tcp: add TCP_RTO_MAX_MIN_SEC definition

On 2/16/25 7:42 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> Add minimum value definition as the lower bound of RTO MAX
> set by users. No functional changes here.

If it is no-op, why it is needed? The commit message didn't explain it either.
I also cannot guess how patch 2 depends on patch 1.

pw-bot: cr