netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <174009183478.1502593.975755252949089833.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:50:34 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
 willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 ykolal@...com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip
 applications transparently

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (net)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>:

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:29:28 +0800 you wrote:
> "Timestamping is key to debugging network stack latency. With
> SO_TIMESTAMPING, bugs that are otherwise incorrectly assumed to be
> network issues can be attributed to the kernel." This is extracted
> from the talk "SO_TIMESTAMPING: Powering Fleetwide RPC Monitoring"
> addressed by Willem de Bruijn at netdevconf 0x17).
> 
> There are a few areas that need optimization with the consideration of
> easier use and less performance impact, which I highlighted and mainly
> discussed at netconf 2024 with Willem de Bruijn and John Fastabend:
> uAPI compatibility, extra system call overhead, and the need for
> application modification. I initially managed to solve these issues
> by writing a kernel module that hooks various key functions. However,
> this approach is not suitable for the next kernel release. Therefore,
> a BPF extension was proposed. During recent period, Martin KaFai Lau
> provides invaluable suggestions about BPF along the way. Many thanks
> here!
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v13,01/12] bpf: add networking timestamping support to bpf_get/setsockopt()
    (no matching commit)
  - [bpf-next,v13,02/12] bpf: prepare the sock_ops ctx and call bpf prog for TX timestamping
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/df600f3b1d79
  - [bpf-next,v13,03/12] bpf: prevent unsafe access to the sock fields in the BPF timestamping callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fd93eaffb3f9
  - [bpf-next,v13,04/12] bpf: disable unsafe helpers in TX timestamping callbacks
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2958624b2530
  - [bpf-next,v13,05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/aa290f93a4af
  - [bpf-next,v13,06/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_SCHED_CB callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6b98ec7e882a
  - [bpf-next,v13,07/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_SND_SW_CB callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ecebb17ad818
  - [bpf-next,v13,08/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_SND_HW_CB callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2deaf7f42b8c
  - [bpf-next,v13,09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_ACK_CB callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b3b81e6b009d
  - [bpf-next,v13,10/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_SENDMSG_CB callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c9525d240c81
  - [bpf-next,v13,11/12] bpf: support selective sampling for bpf timestamping
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/59422464266f
  - [bpf-next,v13,12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f4924aec58dd

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html