[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d831ac5e-96b9-47de-93ed-3d4f10a8b2aa@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:39:06 +0800
From: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] igc: Change Tx mode for MQPRIO offloading
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>>> index 1e44374ca1ffbb86e9893266c590f318984ef574..6e4582de9602db2c6667f1736cc2acaa4d4b5201 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static unsigned int igc_tsn_new_flags(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
>>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QAV_ENABLED;
>>>
>>> if (adapter->strict_priority_enable)
>>> - new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_LEGACY_ENABLED;
>>> + new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED;
>>>
>>> return new_flags;
>>> }
>>
>> IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED is set multiple times in different lines:
>>
>> if (adapter->taprio_offload_enable)
>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED;
>>
>> if (is_any_launchtime(adapter))
>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED;
>>
>> if (is_cbs_enabled(adapter))
>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QAV_ENABLED;
>>
>> if (adapter->strict_priority_enable)
>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED;
>>
>> return new_flags;
>> }
>>
>> We can combine the conditions to simplify:
>> if (adapter->taprio_offload_enable ||
>> is_any_launchtime(adapter) ||
>> adapter->strict_priority_enable)
>> new_flags |= IGC_FLAG_TSN_QBV_ENABLED;
>
> Sure.
>
> Should I send a v2 or do you want to carry this patch in your next fpe
> series?
I think you can go ahead with v2. It shouldn’t conflict much with the next
fpe series, and if my future series gets stalled, at least yours won’t be
affected.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists