netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e378ffb9-2424-4b09-b5fd-688f4f3d1556@hetzner-cloud.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:03:02 +0100
From: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@...zner-cloud.de>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, andrii@...nel.org,
 eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
 haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver

Am 25.02.25 um 15:55 schrieb Willem de Bruijn:
> Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@...zner-cloud.de>
>> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> 
> Please don't add tags, unless a person has explicitly added them.
> 
> And they are only sticky when the code has not been changed since
> they added them.
> 
> These are only in the cover letter, so not picked up. But for future
> revisions and patches.

Oh, I'm sorry. I checked https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
but must have misunderstood it then.

To clarify:
So these tags are limited to a single patch of the patch series and I should only
carry them over, when the single patch where they were added to is re-sent in a
follow-up patch series without changes?

Thank you. I still have to familiarise myself with the mailinglist processes.

Marcus