[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec8fbe36-138f-4a0b-a8d3-95e49187a47a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:24:48 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/8] net: pktgen: fix mpls maximum labels list
parsing
On 2/24/25 10:22 AM, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Fix mpls maximum labels list parsing up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS/16 entries
> (instead of up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS - 1).
Very minor nit...
The above comments sounds misleading to me. I read it as the new limit
is MAX_MPLS_LABELS divided by 16, that is 1.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists