[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250227144243.6953f14e@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:42:43 +0100
From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/8] net: pktgen: fix mpls maximum labels
list parsing
Hello Paolo,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:24:48 +0100, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 2/24/25 10:22 AM, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> > Fix mpls maximum labels list parsing up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS/16 entries
> > (instead of up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS - 1).
>
> Very minor nit...
>
> The above comments sounds misleading to me. I read it as the new limit
> is MAX_MPLS_LABELS divided by 16, that is 1.
O.k, will rephrase on next patch iteration, thanks for review!
Regards,
Peter
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists