[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ec120f3-d1b9-4de8-a203-8e08720b4ab7@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:22:54 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov
<razor@...ckwall.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netkit: Remove double invocation to clear ipvs
property flag
On 2/27/25 2:33 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:29:27 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> With ipvs_reset() now done unconditionally in skb_scrub_packet()
>> we would then call the former twice netkit_prep_forward(). Thus
>> remove the now unnecessary explicit call.
>>
>> Fixes: de2c211868b9 ("ipvs: Always clear ipvs_property flag in skb_scrub_packet()")
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>> Cc: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
>> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> [ Sending to net since de2c211868b9 is in net ]
>
> I see. But if that's okay with you we'll apply it to net-next tomorrow,
> once the trees converge?
Yes, that's totally fine, too. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists