[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<174078303499.2301678.16469844740155000633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:50:34 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, dsahern@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] inet: ping: remove extra
skb_clone()/consume_skb()
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:34:35 +0000 you wrote:
> First patch in the series moves ICMP_EXT_ECHOREPLY handling in icmp_rcv()
> to prepare the second patch.
>
> The second patch removes one skb_clone()/consume_skb() pair
> when processing ICMP_EXT_REPLY packets. Some people
> use hundreds of "ping -fq ..." to stress hosts :)
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/2] ipv4: icmp: do not process ICMP_EXT_ECHOREPLY for broadcast/multicast addresses
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/daeb6a8f3b00
- [net-next,2/2] inet: ping: avoid skb_clone() dance in ping_rcv()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a7e38208fe71
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists