[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8nXrbFjvFo-d4hH@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:13:17 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
alexanderduyck@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] eth: fbnic: fix typo in compile assert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:51:49AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We should be validating the Rx count on the Rx struct,
> not the Tx struct. There is no real change here, rx_stats
> and tx_stats are instances of the same struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/meta/fbnic/fbnic_txrx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Good catch.
Acked-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists