lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250306123448.189615da@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:34:48 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:12:52 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> >    The exact expectations on the response time will vary by subsystem.
> >    The patch review SLA the subsystem had set for itself can sometimes
> >    be found in the subsystem documentation. Failing that as a rule of thumb
> >    reviewers should try to respond quicker than what is the usual patch
> >    review delay of the subsystem maintainer. The resulting expectations
> >    may range from two working days for fast-paced subsystems (e.g. networking)  
> 
> So no less than two working days for any subsystem.
> Okay, now this makes more sense.

Could you explain to me why this is a problem for you?
You're obviously capable of opening your email client once a day.
Are you waiting for QA results or some such?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ