[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ae56b95-8736-405b-b090-2ecd2e247988@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:13:33 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs
On 06/03/2025 22:34, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:12:52 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>> The exact expectations on the response time will vary by subsystem.
>>> The patch review SLA the subsystem had set for itself can sometimes
>>> be found in the subsystem documentation. Failing that as a rule of thumb
>>> reviewers should try to respond quicker than what is the usual patch
>>> review delay of the subsystem maintainer. The resulting expectations
>>> may range from two working days for fast-paced subsystems (e.g. networking)
>>
>> So no less than two working days for any subsystem.
>> Okay, now this makes more sense.
>
> Could you explain to me why this is a problem for you?
Nothing special about "me" here.
I thought it's obvious. As patches are coming asynchronously, it is not
rare to won't be able to respond within a single working day.
This becomes significantly rarer with two consecutive working days.
> You're obviously capable of opening your email client once a day.
> Are you waiting for QA results or some such?
No. I update when I do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists