netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b9527c6-bb47-4063-a770-0e69f52856b8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:26 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs



On 06/03/2025 21:43, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:20:58 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> It's pretty obvious for everyone that responding within 24h cannot be
>> committed, and is not always achievable.
> 
> On the occasion that you are too busy to look at the list on a given
> day you can just take the patch via your own tree. It's not like we're
> marking the patch as Rejected, we're marking it as Awaiting Upstream.
> 
> nvidia's employees patches should go via your tree, in the first place.
> What are you even arguing about. Seriously.

Now this is a different argument.
For this, I'll resend the patch now.

Regarding the other argument, I still didn't see a single place stating 
24h (or a single working day).

Thanks.