lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250306134638.3b4f234e@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:46:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:13:33 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> >> So no less than two working days for any subsystem.
> >> Okay, now this makes more sense.  
> > 
> > Could you explain to me why this is a problem for you?  
> 
> Nothing special about "me" here.
> 
> I thought it's obvious. As patches are coming asynchronously, it is not 
> rare to won't be able to respond within a single working day.
> 
> This becomes significantly rarer with two consecutive working days.

On one thread Saeed is claiming that nVidia is a major netdev
contributor, and pillar of the community.

On another thread it's too hard for the main mlx5 maintainer
to open their inbox once a day to look at patches for their
own driver, that they were CCed on.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ