netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z8odjMEMTtJKhtal@x130>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:11:24 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
	tariqt@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

On 06 Mar 11:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:32:52 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> I thought it was 48h
>
>Always happy to hear your thoughts Saeed. When you have a sec, could
>you do the math between the following two dates for me, and tell me
>if it's less or more than 48 hours.

I was talking about the 24h expectation, it is too tight.
48hr was always the expectation in netdev mailing list, let's keep it that
way, If any of the driver maintainers is late to respond then they will
have to take it to own queue.

>
>Date: Mon,  3 Mar 2025 14:32:00 +0100
>Date: Wed,  5 Mar 2025 20:55:15 +0200
>

Sure I wasn't arguing about what happened here, I agree with the policy,
I just didn't understand where the 24hr thing came from, it is 48h.

>Thank you!