[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00e301db8e49$95bfbf90$c13f3eb0$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:10:49 +0530
From: "Swathi K S" <swathi.ks@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>, <ravi.patel@...sung.com>, <gost.dev@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
bindings
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: 05 March 2025 21:12
> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@...sung.com>; krzk+dt@...nel.org;
> andrew+netdev@...n.ch; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
> kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; robh@...nel.org;
> conor+dt@...nel.org; richardcochran@...il.com;
> mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com; alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com
> Cc: rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> pankaj.dubey@...sung.com; ravi.patel@...sung.com;
> gost.dev@...sung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
> bindings
>
> On 05/03/2025 10:12, Swathi K S wrote:
> > Add FSD Ethernet compatible in Synopsys dt-bindings document. Add FSD
> > Ethernet YAML schema to enable the DT validation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@...sung.com>
>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch
> changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list.
> Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches
> *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags
> received on the version they apply.
>
> Please read:
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=19972162-781c345b-1996aa2d-
> 000babffae10-7bd6b1a1d78b210b&q=1&e=94dcc3a6-5303-441a-8c1e-
> de696b216f86&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12-
> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-
> patches.rst%23L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Hi Krzysztof,
As per a review comment received from Russell, I had added 2 new properties to the DT - assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents properties.
The example in the DT binding reflects the same.
I felt it wouldn't be fair to add 'Reviewed-by' tag without you reviewing the updates again.
But I should have mentioned that in cover letter and apologies for missing to do that.
- Swathi
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists