lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bc2cc11-3a87-479e-a0e0-c593e3214540@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:33:42 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
 <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue
 <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] stmmac: intel: Fix warning message for
 return value in intel_tsn_lane_is_available()



On 10/3/2025 10:20 pm, Kory Maincent wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:08:35 +0800
> Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fix the warning "warn: missing error code? 'ret'" in the
>> intel_tsn_lane_is_available() function.
>>
>> The function now returns 0 to indicate that a TSN lane was found and
>> returns -EINVAL when it is not found.
>>
>> Fixes: a42f6b3f1cc1 ("net: stmmac: configure SerDes according to the
>> interface mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> This patch is a fix it should go net instead net-next.
> Could you resend the patch with net prefix?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> 
> Thank you!

Hi Kory,

Thank you for your feedback. I understand that the patch is a fix. However, 
since the code is not yet in the 'net' tree, we are unable to apply the fix 
there.

I'm not sure if there is another way to handle this fix other than sending 
it to the 'net-next' tree. I would appreciate any guidance you might have 
on this matter.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ