netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] tcp: add some RTO MIN and DELACK MAX {bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL+tcoB-i1sHWCi53c+keiAF1qeL9uNQH+u9QZFgcwO7bF8qbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:13:07 +0100
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	dsahern@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, 
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, 
	sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, 
	kuniyu@...zon.com, ncardwell@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] tcp: add some RTO MIN and DELACK MAX
 {bpf_}set/getsockopt supports

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 5:57 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 9:56 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Introduce bpf_sol_tcp_getsockopt() helper.
> >
> > Add bpf_getsockopt for RTO MIN and DELACK MAX.
> >
> > Add setsockopt/getsockopt for RTO MIN and DELACK MAX.
> >
> > Add corresponding selftests for bpf.
> >
> > v2
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250309123004.85612-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
> > 1. add bpf getsockopt common helper
> > 2. target bpf-next net branch
>
> Some of us are busy attending netdev conference.
>
> Please split this series in two, one for pure TCP changes and one
> other for BPF, and send it after the netdev conference ends.

No problem. I will handle the BPF part first.

>
> It is not because BPF stuff is added that suddenly a series can escape
> TCP maintainers attention.

Oh, it is obviously not my intention :) The netdev parts are
definitely needed TCP maintainers ack for sure :)

Thanks,
Jason