[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9KTixM7_vc_GFe-@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:12:59 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: avoid unnecessary work in
stmmac_release()/stmmac_dvr_remove()
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:31:32PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This small series is a subset of a RFC I sent earlier. These two
> patches remove code that is unnecessary and/or wrong in these paths.
> Details in each commit.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
Hi Jakub,
Why is this series showing in patchwork, but not being subjected to
any nipabot tests?
There's also "net: phylink: expand on .pcs_config() method
documentation" which isn't being subjected to nipabot tests.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists