netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: avoid unnecessary work in stmmac_release()/stmmac_dvr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8176af6a-07b0-4f57-848e-6d161fe58746@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:34:27 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: avoid unnecessary work in
 stmmac_release()/stmmac_dvr_remove()

On 3/13/25 9:12 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:31:32PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This small series is a subset of a RFC I sent earlier. These two
>> patches remove code that is unnecessary and/or wrong in these paths.
>> Details in each commit.
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 5 -----
>>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Why is this series showing in patchwork, but not being subjected to
> any nipabot tests?
> 
> There's also "net: phylink: expand on .pcs_config() method
> documentation" which isn't being subjected to nipabot tests.

We had an outage in the nipa infra that caused no test running for a
while. At least it entered later CI runs.

Cheers,

Paolo