netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/15] AccECN protocol patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iLQcVAwgsO-n91j48D30wwcufo72E_uS2CuppFxeUREzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:33:43 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dave.taht@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	jhs@...atatu.com, kuba@...nel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org, 
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, 
	horms@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, donald.hunter@...il.com, 
	ast@...erby.net, liuhangbin@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, ij@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com, 
	koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com, g.white@...lelabs.com, 
	ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com, 
	cheshire@...le.com, rs.ietf@....at, Jason_Livingood@...cast.com, 
	vidhi_goel@...le.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/15] AccECN protocol patch series

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 1:27 AM <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Plese find v2:
>
> v2 (18-03-2025)
> - Add one missing patch from previous AccECN protocol preparation patch series to this patch series
>
> The full patch series can be found in
> https://github.com/L4STeam/linux-net-next/commits/upstream_l4steam/
>
> The Accurate ECN draft can be found in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-28
>
> Best regards,
> Chia-Yu
>
> Chia-Yu Chang (1):
>   tcp: accecn: AccECN option failure handling


I do not see any tests, how can this be tested ?

I am extremely worried.