[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <uegesbo7pz5hrzdpepaiecltryrxlf65d3wofi5e36ivxvded7@2qfjdh73qiby>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:19:35 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
tariqt@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, dakr@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, cratiu@...dia.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, konrad.knitter@...el.com, cjubran@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/3] faux: extend the creation function for
module namespace
Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:46:56PM +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> --- a/include/linux/module.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
>> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
>> /* This is a #define so the string doesn't get put in every .o file */
>> #define module_name(mod) \
>> ({ \
>> - struct module *__mod = (mod); \
>> + const struct module *__mod = (mod); \
>> __mod ? __mod->name : "kernel"; \
>> })
>
>This feels like it should be a separate change, right? Doesn't have to
>do with this patch.
True. Will split.
>
>greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists