netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] pull request for net: batman-adv 2025-03-13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87c90ae7-2945-4428-b8ac-576082373661@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:27:50 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
 Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pull request for net: batman-adv 2025-03-13

On 3/18/25 2:56 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 March 2025 12:05:52 CET Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> The series does not apply cleanly to the net tree, could you please
>> rebase it?
> 
> $ git log -1 --oneline
> 9a81fc3480bf (HEAD, net/main) ipv6: Set errno after ip_fib_metrics_init() in ip6_route_info_create().
> 
> $ git pull --no-ff git://git.open-mesh.org/linux-merge.git tags/batadv-net-pullrequest-20250313
> From git://git.open-mesh.org/linux-merge
>  * tag                         batadv-net-pullrequest-20250313 -> FETCH_HEAD
> Merge made by the 'ort' strategy.
>  net/batman-adv/bat_iv_ogm.c | 3 +--
>  net/batman-adv/bat_v_ogm.c  | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> So, it works perfectly fine for me .
> 
> I understand that it is confusing that that Simon send a PR with 5 patches 
> mentioned. It is actually only 1 patch - 4 were already submitted in the last 
> PR. But still, the PR seems to apply cleanly for me.
> 
> Any hints how to reproduce your problem?

My scripts fail to apply the posted patches (when the patches are posted
on the ML, the script try to apply them and compare to the PR tag).

Direct pulling the tag is successful, but I find a single patch there:

548b0c5de761 ("batman-adv: Ignore own maximum aggregation size during R")

instead of the mentioned 5.


>> While at it, could you please include the target tree in the subj prefix?
> 
> It currently mentions net in the subject. But I think you mean to change it 
> from "[PATCH 0/5] pull request for net: batman-adv 2025-03-13" to 
> "[PATCH net 0/5] pull request: batman-adv 2025-03-13". Or which exact format 
> do you prefer?

The preferred format is the latter: "[PATCH net ...]". That additionally
helps the CI to do the right things.

Thanks,

Paolo