[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250326043906.2ab47b20@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 04:39:06 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Pedro Tammela
<pctammela@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan.lennox42@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan.lennox@....com>, David Ahern
<dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@...workplumber.org>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri
Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tc-tests: Update tc police action tests for tc
buffer size rounding fixes.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 07:15:26 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:16:14 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > AFAICS this fix will break the tests when running all version of
> > > iproute2 except the upcoming one. I think this is not good enough; you
> > > should detect the tc tool version and update expected output accordingly.
> > >
> > > If that is not possible, I think it would be better to simply revert the
> > > TC commit.
> >
> > Alternatively since it's a regex match, maybe we could accept both?
> >
> > - "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: police 0x1 rate 7Mbit burst 1024Kb mtu 2Kb action reclassify",
> > + "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: police 0x1 rate 7Mbit burst (1Mb|1024Kb) mtu 2Kb action reclassify",
> >
> > ? Not sure which option is most "correct" from TDC's perspective..
>
> It should work. Paolo's suggestion is also reasonable.
Sorry for the ping but where are we with this? TDC has been "red" for
the last 3 weeks, would be really neat to get a clear run before we
ship the net-next tree to Linus :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists