[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250331182532.1523-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:25:27 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net] rtnetlink: Use register_pernet_subsys() in rtnl_net_debug_init().
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:48:49 +0100
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 03:04:48PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > rtnl_net_debug_init() registers rtnl_net_debug_net_ops by
> > register_pernet_device() but calls unregister_pernet_subsys()
> > in case register_netdevice_notifier() fails.
> >
> > It corrupts pernet_list because first_device is not updated
> > in unregister_pernet_device().
>
> Hi Iwashima-san,
>
> Maybe I am confused, but should the above line refer to
> unregister_pernet_subsys()?
Ah, exactly :)
>
> And perhaps it would be yet clearer to say something like:
>
> It corrupts pernet_list because first_device is not updated
> in register_pernet_device() but not unregister_pernet_subsys()?
Will rewrite in v2.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists