netdev - [PATCH net] netlink: specs: fix schema of rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250401012939.2116915-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:29:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	horms@...nel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	donald.hunter@...il.com,
	yuyanghuang@...gle.com,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH net] netlink: specs: fix schema of rt_addr

The spec is mis-formatted, schema validation says:

  Failed validating 'type' in schema['properties']['operations']['properties']['list']['items']['properties']['dump']['properties']['request']['properties']['value']:
    {'minimum': 0, 'type': 'integer'}

  On instance['operations']['list'][3]['dump']['request']['value']:
    '58 - ifa-family'

The ifa-family clearly wants to be part of an attribute list.

Fixes: dfb0f7d9d979 ("doc/netlink: Add spec for rt addr messages")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: donald.hunter@...il.com
CC: yuyanghuang@...gle.com
CC: jacob.e.keller@...el.com
---
 Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_addr.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_addr.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_addr.yaml
index 5dd5469044c7..3bc9b6f9087e 100644
--- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_addr.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_addr.yaml
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ protonum: 0
       dump:
         request:
           value: 58
+          attributes:
             - ifa-family
         reply:
           value: 58
-- 
2.49.0