[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409073942.26be7914@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:39:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Jagielski, Jedrzej" <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>
Cc: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@....com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Dumazet, Eric"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Kalesh AP
<kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>, "R, Bharath" <bharath.r@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/15] devlink: add value check to
devlink_info_version_put()
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:14:23 +0000 Jagielski, Jedrzej wrote:
> No insisting on that but should empty entry be really presented to the user?
> Especially unintentionally? Actually it's exposing some driver's shortcomings.
> That means the output was not properly validated so imho there's no point in
> printing it.
+1, FWIW, I don't see the point of outputting keys without values.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists