[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<174425223377.3120264.13308441300773749640.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:30:33 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] bridge: Prevent unicast ARP/NS packets from
being suppressed by bridge
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:40:22 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>
>
> Currently, unicast ARP requests/NS packets are replied by bridge when
> suppression is enabled, then they are also forwarded, which results two
> replicas of ARP reply/NA - one from the bridge and second from the target.
>
> The purpose of ARP/ND suppression is to reduce flooding in the broadcast
> domain, which is not relevant for unicast packets. In addition, the use
> case of unicast ARP/NS is to poll a specific host, so it does not make
> sense to have the switch answer on behalf of the host.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/2] net: bridge: Prevent unicast ARP/NS packets from being suppressed by bridge
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/827b2ac8e796
- [net-next,2/2] selftests: test_bridge_neigh_suppress: Test unicast ARP/NS with suppression
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0ffb594212a0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists