[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250416190247.2820-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:02:45 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 13/14] ipv6: Protect nh->f6i_list with spinlock and flag.
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:17:13 +0200
> On 4/14/25 8:15 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > @@ -1498,7 +1504,23 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct fib6_info *rt,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > - err = fib6_add_rt2node(fn, rt, info, extack, &purge_list);
> > + if (rt->nh) {
> > + spin_lock(&rt->nh->lock);
> > +
> > + if (rt->nh->dead) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has been deleted");
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + } else {
> > + err = fib6_add_rt2node(fn, rt, info, extack, &purge_list);
> > + if (!err)
> > + list_add(&rt->nh_list, &rt->nh->f6i_list);
> > + }
>
> Maybe move the new check and list_add inside fib6_add_rt2node() or
> bundle all the above in a new helper?
fib6_add_rt2node() has return in many places, so a new hepler makes
more sense to me.
Will add fib6_add_rt2node_nh() and move spin_lock() section there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists