[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec58ea9c-8034-4133-acca-d4d06e6e1f48@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:19:06 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
CC: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
<nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: visconti: convert to
set_clk_tx_rate() method
On 4/16/2025 2:43 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Convert visconti to use the set_clk_tx_rate() method. By doing so,
> the GMAC control register will already have been updated (unlike with
> the fix_mac_speed() method) so this code can be removed while porting
> to the set_clk_tx_rate() method.
>
> There is also no need for the spinlock, and has never been - neither
> fix_mac_speed() nor set_clk_tx_rate() can be called by more than one
> thread at a time, so the lock does nothing useful.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> v2: add Andrew's r-b (he doesn't mind it being preserved for simple fixes)
> fix build errors.
>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists