[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-8N0iMW_KF-GG0V69Ugzf8TTm5CWCZ+4n7uODssBb6A9aKAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:20:54 +0800
From: Crag Wang <crag0715@...il.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@...ltek.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, crag.wang@...l.com,
dell.client.kernel@...l.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force
>
> Adding module parameters is discouraged.
> Also note that you have the option already to re-activate ASPM, you can use the
> standard PCI sysfs attributes under /sys/class/net/<if>/device/link for this.
>
How about adding a quirk table for the matched DMI patterns, allowing
the hardware
makers to opt-in ASPM settings in the kernel segment as an alternative
to the PCI sysfs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists