netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7815c91-e047-4b3e-b3e4-371f30c9dadd@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:13:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap

> Should one host have control, or should the BMC have control? I don't
> actually know what you're talking about w.r.t. DSP0222 or whatever it
> was, nor NC-SI - I don't have these documents.

I gave a reference to it a few email back in the conversation:

https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.2.0.pdf

Linux has an implementation of the protocol in net/nsci

      Andrew