netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aAfk662jTFj4iIQD@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 19:50:19 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 08:13:43PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Should one host have control, or should the BMC have control? I don't
> > actually know what you're talking about w.r.t. DSP0222 or whatever it
> > was, nor NC-SI - I don't have these documents.
> 
> I gave a reference to it a few email back in the conversation:
> 
> https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.2.0.pdf
> 
> Linux has an implementation of the protocol in net/nsci

Hmm. I don't think I have bandwidth to read that spec any time soon,
sorry.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!