[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aArMV06U_dQgp832@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:42:15 -0700
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller " <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
almasrymina@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/4] Extend napi threaded polling to allow
kthread based busy polling
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:02:21PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> Add a new state to napi state enum:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 2eda563307f9..c67a7424605e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ enum {
> NAPI_STATE_THREADED, /* The poll is performed inside its own thread*/
> NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, /* Napi is currently scheduled in threaded mode */
> NAPI_STATE_HAS_NOTIFIER, /* Napi has an IRQ notifier */
> + NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL, /* The threaded napi poller will busy poll */
> + NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED_BUSY_POLL, /* The threaded napi poller is busy polling */
> };
Now that threaded has three states, doesn't the comment for struct
net_device need to be updated?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists