netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250505160253.3d50ebab@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 16:02:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner
 <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with
 local nested BH locking.

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:47:40 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I was looking at the build-time defined per-CPU variables in net/ and
> added the needed local-BH-locks in order to be able to remove the
> current per-CPU lock in local_bh_disable() on PREMPT_RT.
> 
> The work is not yet complete, I just wanted to post what I have so far
> instead of sitting on it.

Looks fine overall but we're anticipating a respin for patch 5?
When you repost could you split out the netfilter patches so they 
can be applied by Pablo to the netfilter tree?

And there really doesn't seem to be a strong reason to make this
series longer than 15 patches, so please don't add more:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html