netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250509115823.DriYhjUm@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 13:58:23 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with
 local nested BH locking.

On 2025-05-05 16:02:53 [-0700], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:47:40 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I was looking at the build-time defined per-CPU variables in net/ and
> > added the needed local-BH-locks in order to be able to remove the
> > current per-CPU lock in local_bh_disable() on PREMPT_RT.
> > 
> > The work is not yet complete, I just wanted to post what I have so far
> > instead of sitting on it.
> 
> Looks fine overall but we're anticipating a respin for patch 5?
> When you repost could you split out the netfilter patches so they 
> can be applied by Pablo to the netfilter tree?

Yes, will do. I was mostly off the last week.

> And there really doesn't seem to be a strong reason to make this
> series longer than 15 patches, so please don't add more:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Okay.

Sebastian