[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250512171652.5bb0b0ee@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 17:16:52 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Simon
Horman" <horms@...nel.org>, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ice: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and
ndo_hwtstamp_set()
On Mon, 12 May 2025 12:06:56 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > Ok. I have 3 more Intel conversions pending (igb, ixgbe, i40e), but I've
> > put a stop for today. I assume it's fine to post these to net-next and
> > not to the iwl-next tree, or would you prefer otherwise?
>
> I think we typically prefer to go through iwl-next because that lets us
> run a validation test pass. I have no personal objection if the netdev
> maintainers want to take these directly.
The real question is whether you can get these back to the list before
Vladimir is done converting all drivers :) If yes - let's follow the
usual path and take these via iwl. If Vladimir can convert faster than
you can validate then we should take these direct..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists