[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250513102954.2e537e99@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:29:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell
King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, danishanwar@...com, srk@...com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add
network flow classification support
On Tue, 13 May 2025 15:13:12 +0300 Roger Quadros wrote:
> + mutex_lock(&port->rxnfc_lock);
> + loc = am65_cpsw_policer_find_match(port, &cfg);
> + if (loc >= 0 && loc != fs->location) {
> + netdev_info(port->ndev,
> + "rule already exists in location %d. not adding\n",
> + loc);
> + mutex_unlock(&port->rxnfc_lock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* delete exisiting rule */
> + if (loc >= 0) {
> + rule = am65_cpsw_get_rule(port, loc);
> + if (rule)
> + am65_cpsw_del_rule(port, rule);
> + }
> +
> + rule = devm_kzalloc(port->common->dev, sizeof(*rule), GFP_KERNEL);
please don't use devm_ for objects you must support explicitly freeing
> + if (!rule)
> + return -ENOMEM;
missing unlock
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->list);
> + memcpy(&rule->cfg, &cfg, sizeof(cfg));
> + rule->location = fs->location;
> + ret = am65_cpsw_add_rule(port, rule);
> + mutex_unlock(&port->rxnfc_lock);
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists