[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5b65bc4-3684-4314-b88b-4b78c919cb6c@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:53:46 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] ovpn: improve 'no route to host' debug
message
On 5/9/25 4:26 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/peer.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/peer.c
> index 24eb9d81429e..a1fd27b9c038 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/peer.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/peer.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ void ovpn_peer_endpoints_update(struct ovpn_peer *peer, struct sk_buff *skb)
> */
> if (unlikely(!ipv6_addr_equal(&bind->local.ipv6,
> &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))) {
> - net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: learning local IPv6 for peer %d (%pI6c -> %pI6c\n",
> + net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: learning local IPv6 for peer %d (%pI6c -> %pI6c)\n",
> netdev_name(peer->ovpn->dev),
> peer->id, &bind->local.ipv6,
> &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr);
Since you have to repost it's better to move this chunk to a separate
patch, as it's unrelated to the previous one - or at very least mention
it explicitly in the commit message.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists