[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69341806-3ffd-41f0-95d6-6c8b750a6b45@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:02:20 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of
__skb_checksum()
On 5/10/25 5:41 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Instead of calling __skb_checksum() with a skb_checksum_ops struct that
> does CRC32C, just call the new function skb_crc32c(). This is faster
> and simpler.
Bernard, since you are the owner and author of the siw driver, please
help with reviewing this patch.
Eric, do you already have a test case for the siw driver? If not,
multiple tests in the blktests framework use this driver intensively,
including the SRP tests that I wrote myself. See also
https://github.com/osandov/blktests.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists