[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250515201247.GM1411@quark>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:12:47 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of
__skb_checksum()
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:02:20PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/10/25 5:41 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Instead of calling __skb_checksum() with a skb_checksum_ops struct that
> > does CRC32C, just call the new function skb_crc32c(). This is faster
> > and simpler.
> Bernard, since you are the owner and author of the siw driver, please help
> with reviewing this patch.
>
> Eric, do you already have a test case for the siw driver? If not,
> multiple tests in the blktests framework use this driver intensively,
> including the SRP tests that I wrote myself. See also
> https://github.com/osandov/blktests.
No. I'll try that out when I have a chance.
If the developers/maintainers of the driver could help test it, that would be a
lot easier though. I've been cleaning up the CRC calls across the whole kernel,
and it gets time-consuming when individual subsystems insist on me running their
custom test suite(s) and providing subsystem-specific benchmarks.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists