lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM0EoMmQau9+uXVm-vpuWqYjh=51a_CCS6orS6VrK6qBdddxrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 07:06:27 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Savy <savy@...t3mfailure.io>, 
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>, 
	Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, 
	Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] net/sched: Soft Lockup/Task Hang and OOM Loop in netem_dequeue

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:04 AM William Liu <will@...lsroot.io> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 17th, 2025 at 2:09 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately we cant change the approach of looping to the root at
> > this point because it may be expected behavior by some setups.
> >
> > To the setup in the script you shared: that is most certainly not a
> > practical setup
> > So, two approaches to resolve it:
> > 1) Either we disallow altogether the ability to have a hierarchy of
> > netems in a qdisc tree. It would mean to scan the tree on
> > configuration and make sure there's not already a parent netem in
> > existence. If you want to be more fine grained we can check that netem
> > is not trying to duplicate packets
> >
> > or 2) we put a loop counter to make sure - for the case of netem - we
> > dont loop more than once (which i believe is the design intent for
> > netem).
> >
> > cheers,
> > jamal
>
> Hi Jamal,
>
> We decided to opt for the second approach by adding a bitfield in sk_buff. We also moved the duplication to happen after the original sk_buff finishes the enqueue to avoid using a stale limit check value.
>

I am afraid using bits on the skb will not go well around here - and
zero chance if you are using those bits for a one-off like netem.
Take a look at net/sched/act_mirred.c for a more "acceptable"
solution, see use of mirred_nest_level.

Not that it matters but I dont understand why you moved the skb2 check
around. Was that resolving anything meaningful?

cheers,
jamal

> We also considered the first approach by traversing the tree and checking for netem_ops as a way to idenitfy the netem qdisc, but feel that this is not very elegant.
>
> Of course, this approach would disable duplication in netem qdiscs
> that are children of a netem qdisc with duplication. However, we
> are not aware of a good way to do a real de-duplication check like that for sk_buff. Let us know what you think of this patch below.
>
> Best,
> Will
> Savy
>
> From 33af24d4bef8b141b608fa513528a804f689f823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 08:46:15 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] net/sched: Fix duplication logic in netem_enqueue
>
> netem_enqueue's duplication prevention logic is broken when multiple
> netem qdiscs with duplication enabled are stacked together as seen
> in [1]. Add a bit in sk_buff to track whether it has previously been
> duplicated by netem. Also move the duplication logic to happen after
> the initial packet has finished the enqueue process to preserve the
> accuracy of the limit check.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/8DuRWwfqjoRDLDmBMlIfbrsZg9Gx50DHJc1ilxsEBNe2D6NMoigR_eIRIG0LOjMc3r10nUUZtArXx4oZBIdUfZQrwjcQhdinnMis_0G7VEk=@willsroot.io/
>
> Fixes: 0afb51e72855 ("[PKT_SCHED]: netem: reinsert for duplication")
> Reported-by: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>
> Reported-by: Savino Dicanosa <savy@...t3mfailure.io>
> Signed-off-by: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>
> Signed-off-by: Savino Dicanosa <savy@...t3mfailure.io>
> ---
>  include/linux/skbuff.h |  4 ++++
>  net/sched/sch_netem.c  | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index b974a277975a..e6b53af6322b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ enum skb_tstamp_type {
>   * @csum_level: indicates the number of consecutive checksums found in
>   *     the packet minus one that have been verified as
>   *     CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY (max 3)
> + *      @netem_duplicate: indicates that netem has already duplicated this packet
>   * @unreadable: indicates that at least 1 of the fragments in this skb is
>   *     unreadable.
>   * @dst_pending_confirm: need to confirm neighbour
> @@ -1026,6 +1027,9 @@ struct sk_buff {
>     __u8            slow_gro:1;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP_SCTP)
>     __u8            csum_not_inet:1;
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_SCH_NETEM)
> +   __u8                    netem_duplicate:1;
>  #endif
>     __u8            unreadable:1;
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NET_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_NET_XGRESS)
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
> index fdd79d3ccd8c..ce6e55b49acb 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,8 @@ static int netem_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
>     skb->prev = NULL;
>
>     /* Random duplication */
> -   if (q->duplicate && q->duplicate >= get_crandom(&q->dup_cor, &q->prng))
> +   if (!skb->netem_duplicate && q->duplicate &&
> +       q->duplicate >= get_crandom(&q->dup_cor, &q->prng))
>         ++count;
>
>     /* Drop packet? */
> @@ -531,21 +532,6 @@ static int netem_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
>         return NET_XMIT_DROP;
>     }
>
> -   /*
> -    * If doing duplication then re-insert at top of the
> -    * qdisc tree, since parent queuer expects that only one
> -    * skb will be queued.
> -    */
> -   if (skb2) {
> -       struct Qdisc *rootq = qdisc_root_bh(sch);
> -       u32 dupsave = q->duplicate; /* prevent duplicating a dup... */
> -
> -       q->duplicate = 0;
> -       rootq->enqueue(skb2, rootq, to_free);
> -       q->duplicate = dupsave;
> -       skb2 = NULL;
> -   }
> -
>     qdisc_qstats_backlog_inc(sch, skb);
>
>     cb = netem_skb_cb(skb);
> @@ -613,6 +599,19 @@ static int netem_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
>         sch->qstats.requeues++;
>     }
>
> +   /*
> +    * If doing duplication then re-insert at top of the
> +    * qdisc tree, since parent queuer expects that only one
> +    * skb will be queued.
> +    */
> +   if (skb2) {
> +       struct Qdisc *rootq = qdisc_root_bh(sch);
> +
> +       skb2->netem_duplicate = 1;
> +       rootq->enqueue(skb2, rootq, to_free);
> +       skb2 = NULL;
> +   }
> +
>  finish_segs:
>     if (skb2)
>         __qdisc_drop(skb2, to_free);
> --
> 2.43.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ