netdev - Re: [PATCH v16 09/22] cxl: Prepare memdev creation for type2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <682e20481eb60_1626e100b5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 11:49:44 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, Ben Cheatham
	<benjamin.cheatham@....com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 09/22] cxl: Prepare memdev creation for type2

alejandro.lucero-palau@ wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> 
> Current cxl core is relying on a CXL_DEVTYPE_CLASSMEM type device when
> creating a memdev leading to problems when obtaining cxl_memdev_state
> references from a CXL_DEVTYPE_DEVMEM type.
> 
> Modify check for obtaining cxl_memdev_state adding CXL_DEVTYPE_DEVMEM
> support.
> 
> Make devm_cxl_add_memdev accessible from a accel driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h      |  2 --
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/cxl/cxl.h         |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Makes sense

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>