[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250522161023.GT7435@unreal>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 19:10:23 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance
locking
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:51:32AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:08:57 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > This series by Cosmin converts mlx5 to use the recently added netdev
> > instance locking scheme.
>
> Are you planning to re-submit this as a PR?
> The subject tag and Leon's reviews being present makes me think
> that applying directly is fine, but I wanted to confirm..
Yes, please apply them directly. There are no changes in IPoIB in this
cycle, so it will be safe to merge the code through netdev.
Cosmin added my ROB tags, after internal review, so I didn't want to be silly
and send my Acked-by in addition to already existing tags.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists