[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8865be45-e3a8-479e-b98a-b06e5ed6ee65@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 16:09:25 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@...aicloud.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@...iglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v5 3/4] net: bonding: send peer notify
when failure recovery
On 5/22/25 10:55 AM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index b5c34d7f126c..7f03ca9bcbba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1242,17 +1242,28 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> /* must be called in RCU critical section or with RTNL held */
> static bool bond_should_notify_peers(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> - struct slave *slave = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->curr_active_slave);
> + struct bond_up_slave *usable;
> + struct slave *slave = NULL;
>
> - if (!slave || !bond->send_peer_notif ||
> + if (!bond->send_peer_notif ||
> bond->send_peer_notif %
> max(1, bond->params.peer_notif_delay) != 0 ||
> - !netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev) ||
> - test_bit(__LINK_STATE_LINKWATCH_PENDING, &slave->dev->state))
> + !netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev))
> return false;
>
> + if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> + usable = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->usable_slaves);
> + if (!usable || !READ_ONCE(usable->count))
> + return false;
The above unconditionally changes the current behavior for
BOND_MODE_8023AD regardless of the `broadcast_neighbor` value. Why the
new behavior is not conditioned by broadcast_neighbor == true?
At least a code comment is deserved.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists