netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v5 3/4] net: bonding: send peer notify when failure recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68c3346d-98c4-409a-a772-4f8fe31be57b@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 16:13:09 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Tonghao Zhang <tonghao@...aicloud.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
 Zengbing Tu <tuzengbing@...iglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v5 3/4] net: bonding: send peer notify
 when failure recovery

 5/27/25 4:09 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 5/22/25 10:55 AM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index b5c34d7f126c..7f03ca9bcbba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -1242,17 +1242,28 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
>>  /* must be called in RCU critical section or with RTNL held */
>>  static bool bond_should_notify_peers(struct bonding *bond)
>>  {
>> -	struct slave *slave = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->curr_active_slave);
>> +	struct bond_up_slave *usable;
>> +	struct slave *slave = NULL;
>>  
>> -	if (!slave || !bond->send_peer_notif ||
>> +	if (!bond->send_peer_notif ||
>>  	    bond->send_peer_notif %
>>  	    max(1, bond->params.peer_notif_delay) != 0 ||
>> -	    !netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev) ||
>> -	    test_bit(__LINK_STATE_LINKWATCH_PENDING, &slave->dev->state))
>> +	    !netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev))
>>  		return false;
>>  
>> +	if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
>> +		usable = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->usable_slaves);
>> +		if (!usable || !READ_ONCE(usable->count))
>> +			return false;
> 
> The above unconditionally changes the current behavior for
> BOND_MODE_8023AD regardless of the `broadcast_neighbor` value. Why the
> new behavior is not conditioned by broadcast_neighbor == true?

Not strictly related to this patch, but as a new feature this deserve an
additional test-case.

Note that the series is not threaded correctly in PW - the cover letter
does not belong to this thread. Please adjust that, thanks!

Paolo