netdev - Re: [PATCH] xdp: Remove unused mem_return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250531161549.6e1c69c7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 16:15:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, Mathieu
 Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdp: Remove unused mem_return_failed event

On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:18:13 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:16:38 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>    
> > 
> > Thanks. Will this go through the networking tree or should I just take it?  
> 
> If you're planning to send it to Linus in this MW, still, go for it:
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> If you mean to keep it in your -next tree for next MW I think we should
> take it to avoid conflict noise. But our -next tree is closed during MW
> per linux-next preferences.
> 
> IOW please take it if you wanna ship it now, otherwise please repost
> after MW?

Yeah, I think I'll try to get it in now. I'll ping the maintainers of my
other patches to see if I can get them all in in one go.

Thanks,

-- Steve