netdev - Re: [PATCH] xdp: Remove unused mem_return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250530181813.1024eec5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 18:18:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, Mathieu
 Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdp: Remove unused mem_return_failed event

On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:16:38 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>  
> 
> Thanks. Will this go through the networking tree or should I just take it?

If you're planning to send it to Linus in this MW, still, go for it:
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
If you mean to keep it in your -next tree for next MW I think we should
take it to avoid conflict noise. But our -next tree is closed during MW
per linux-next preferences.

IOW please take it if you wanna ship it now, otherwise please repost
after MW?